Epictetus · c. 50 – c. 135 CE
Discourses 1.5 ¶1–2 — Epictetus
From “Against the Academics”
Translation by George Long (1877)
Epictetus, Discourses 1.5 ¶1–2
If a man, said Epictetus, opposes evident truths, it is not easy to find arguments by which we shall make him change his opinion. But this does not arise either from the man’s strength or the teacher’s weakness; for when the man, though he has been confuted, is hardened like a stone, how shall we then be able to deal with him by argument? Now there are two kinds of hardening, one of the understanding, the other of the sense of shame, when a man is resolved not to assent to what is manifest nor to desist from contradictions. Most of us are afraid of mortification of the body, and would contrive all means to avoid such a thing, but we care not about the soul’s mortification. And indeed with regard to the soul, if a man be in such a state as not to apprehend anything, or understand at all, we think that he is in a bad condition: but if the sense of shame and modesty are deadened, this we call even power (or strength).
Cite this passage
Epictetus, Discourses 1.5 ¶1–2, tr. George Long (1877)
https://whatwouldstoicsdo.com/passage/discourses/1.5.1
Epictetus, Discourses (as recorded by Arrian), tr. George Long (1877). Text: Standard Ebooks (CC0). Sources and licences
In plain English
AI-written notesIt is hard to change the mind of someone who denies obvious truths, and the problem is neither his strength nor the teacher's weakness. There are two kinds of hardening, of the understanding and of the sense of shame, and while we all fear deadening of the body we ignore deadening of the soul, even calling a lack of shame strength.
Older wording
- “confuted”
- — proved wrong in argument
- “mortification”
- — the decay or death of living tissue
- “apprehend”
- — grasp mentally
Themes and situations
- Judgements and impressions
- Virtue and character
- Learning and progress
Quote cards
The opening line of this passage as an image, with its citation — for sharing or keeping.