Seneca · c. 4 BCE – 65 CE
On Clemency 2.7 ¶1 — Seneca
Translation by Aubrey Stewart (1889)
Seneca, On Clemency 2.7 ¶1
But why should he not pardon? Let us decide by exact definition this other slippery matter, the true nature of pardon, and we shall then perceive that the wise man ought not to grant it. Pardon is the remitting of a deserved punishment. The reasons why the wise man ought not to grant this remission are given at length by those of whom this question is specially asked: I will briefly say, as though it were no concern of mine to decide this point, “A man grants pardon to one whom he ought to punish: now the wise man does nothing which he ought not to do, and omits to do nothing which he ought to do: he does not, therefore, remit any punishment which he ought to exact. But the wise man will bestow upon you in a more honourable way that which you wish to obtain by pardon, for he will make allowances for you, will consult your interests, and will correct your bad habits: he will act just as though he were pardoning you, but nevertheless he will not pardon you, because he who pardons admits that in so doing he has neglected a part of his duty. He will only punish some people by reprimanding them, and will inflict no further penalty if he considers that they are of an age which admits of reformation: some people who are undeniably implicated in an odious charge he will acquit, because they were deceived into committing, or were not sober when they committed the offence with which they are charged: he will let his enemies depart unharmed, sometimes even with words of commendation, if they have taken up arms to defend their honour, their covenants with others, their freedom, or on any other honourable ground. All these doings come under the head of mercy, not of pardon. Mercy is free to come to what decision it pleases: she gives her decision, not under any statute, but according to equity and goodness: she may acquit the defendant, or impose what damages she pleases. She does not do any of these things as though she were doing less than justice requires, but as though the justest possible course were that which she adopts. On the other hand, to pardon is not to punish a man whom you have decided ought to be punished; pardon is the remission of a punishment which ought to be inflicted. The first advantage which mercy has over it is that she does not tell those whom she lets off that they ought to have suffered: she is more complete, more honourable than pardon.”
Cite this passage
Seneca, On Clemency 2.7 ¶1, tr. Aubrey Stewart (1889)
https://whatwouldstoicsdo.com/passage/on-clemency/2.7.1
Seneca, Dialogues, tr. Aubrey Stewart (1887–1889). Text: Standard Ebooks (CC0). Sources and licences
In plain English
AI-written notesA technical argument that a wise person never pardons, because pardon means dropping a punishment that was truly owed, whereas mercy means judging by fairness and kindness that no punishment, or a lighter one, is owed in this case. In practice both allow for age, deception, drunkenness or honourable motives and aim to correct rather than crush.
Older wording
- “pardon”
- — cancelling a punishment that was deserved
- “equity”
- — fairness that looks at the particular case instead of rigid rules
- “acquit”
- — declare not guilty
Themes and situations
- Kindness and forgiveness
- Justice and fairness
- Virtue and character
Quote cards
The opening line of this passage as an image, with its citation — for sharing or keeping.