Cicero (on the Stoics) · 106–43 BCE
On Duties 3.104 — Cicero (on the Stoics)
Translation by Walter Miller (1913)
Cicero (on the Stoics), On Duties 3.104
"He need not have been afraid that Jupiter in anger would inflict injury upon him; he is not wont to be angry or hurtful." This argument, at all events, has no more weight against Regulus's conduct than it has against the keeping of any other oath. But in taking an oath it is our duty to consider not what one may have to fear in case of violation but wherein its obligation lies: an oath is an assurance backed by religious sanctity; and a solemn promise given, as before God as one's witness, is to be sacredly kept. For the question no longer concerns the wrath of the gods (for there is no such thing) but the obligations of justice and good faith. For, as Ennius says so admirably: "Gracious Good Faith, on wings upborne; thou oath in Jupiter's great name!" Whoever, therefore, violates his oath violates Good Faith; and, as we find it stated in Cato's speech, our forefathers chose that she should dwell upon the Capitol "neighbour to Jupiter Supreme and Best."
Cite this passage
Cicero (on the Stoics), On Duties 3.104, tr. Walter Miller (1913)
https://whatwouldstoicsdo.com/passage/on-duties/3.104
Cicero, On Duties (De Officiis), tr. Walter Miller (Loeb, 1913). Text: Perseus Digital Library (CC BY-SA 4.0). Sources and licences
In plain English
AI-written notesThe reason to keep an oath is not fear of punishment but the demands of justice and good faith, so a solemn promise binds even if no god would ever be angry. Anyone who breaks an oath violates Good Faith itself, which Romans honoured by giving her a shrine beside Jupiter.
Older wording
- “wont”
- — accustomed
- “sanctity”
- — sacredness
Themes and situations
- Justice and fairness
- Virtue and character
- Duty and roles
- An ethical dilemma
Quote cards
The opening line of this passage as an image, with its citation — for sharing or keeping.